Alex Jones Will Win America By Making Idiotic Movie About President Obama.

You might be wondering what Alex Jones was up to this whole time I was away (or not). If you didn't, I'm goign to tell you anyway. He's too busy making a stupid movie known as Obama Impeachment 2012. It's jammed packed with bullshit and so is the article we will be going over today (the same as the "Obama Impeachmet 2012" link). You might be wondering why he's making this movie. Alex explains beacuse President Obama committed some type of "war crimes"...beacuse George Bush never did. /rolleyes/ (Please Note: Three minus symbols (---) means the start of a paragraph(s) and two (--) of them means the end of the paragraph(s) in the article.)

---

"We can only win by launching Impeach Obama 2012. Whether or not we fully impeach him, we are committed to rebuking these unconstitutional and criminal power grabs and are determined to take the case to the court of public opinion.
–Alex Jones"

--

When I saw that second part I thought they were talking about George Bush...why wasn't there a movie to impeach Bush at the end of 2004? He committed war crimes ( launching illegal offensive on Iraq and oking torture), so where is the Bush movie?
　
---
　
Film director, producer, actor and writer Sean Stone has thrown his weight behind a resolution introduced in the House last month by North Carolina Republican Walter Jones. Resolution 107 states that should the president use offensive military force without the authorization of Congress that such an act would be "an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor."

Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves exclusively for Congress the power to declare war. Both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison argued that the power to declare war must reside in the legislative branch of government and the president will only act as the commander-in-chief and direct the war after it is declared by Congress.
　
--

Ok, two question. Why do we need a resolution if it's already in the Constitution (the Republicans really are stupid aren't they)? And what "war" did the President Obama start?
　
---
　
"The constitution supposes, what the history of all governments demonstrates, that the executive is the branch of power most interested in war, and most prone to it. It has accordingly with studied care vested the question of war in the legislature," Madison wrote.

In the video, Stone notes Obama’s unconstitutional war on Libya was waged "despite the fact that the United States was neither attacked, nor threatened for attack by the nation of Libya."
　
--
　
Wait...President Obama waged a "war" on Libya? Uh, no. The UN Security Council had voted, which we are a part of,  to help out the Libyan people, rebeling against Colonel Gaddiffi, with a No Fly Zone. Other countries had help out (France, and England) taking the lead into Libya to set up a No Fly Zone for Colonel Gaddiffi's Airforce. We didn't even lead into Libya. And a side note; We didn't need Congress to say yes to a "war" because it wasn't a "war". It's was a humanitarian crisis. The Libyan people needed International help from Colonel Gaddiffi killing them and we gave it to them by putting up a No Fly Zone.
Oh, forgot one thing...

"(...)unconstitutional war on Libya was waged "despite the fact that the United States was neither attacked, nor threatened for attack by the nation of Libya."

One word: Iraq. Now where is the film about getting George Bush impeached?
　
---
　
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said during questioning by Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama that the Obama administration does not believe Congress has the exclusive right to declare war and that the Pentagon answers to the United Nations, not the people of the United States.

The Obama administration "does not believe that the Congress has the exclusive power to declare war," Stone notes, and "accordingly the president should be impeached."
　
--
　
One thing should be said of this paragraph about Leon Panetta. He said that, "You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress." about the intervention in Libya. While I think it would be a good thing to go throug the Congress, it could mean trouble for the Libyan people who are needing our help (you know that the Congress would never pass the resolution bill and let people die at the hands of Colonel / Dictator Gaddiffi).
　
---
　
Stone also mentions Obama’s facilitation of the banker engineered 2008 "bailout" as an additiojnal reason he should be tried for High Crimes and Misdemeanors and impeached. Obama’s efforts worked in favor of the "consolidation of private banks, many of them in Europe."
　
--
　
Well, this sentence tell me that this Mr. Stone is really retarted. Why, you may be asking? Let's see if I can point it out for you:
　
" (...) Obama’s facilitation of the banker engineered 2008 "bailout" (...).
　
2008? Didn't President Obama get in office on January 20, 2009? So, how is the banker bailout of 2008 Obama's fault? Like I said, Mr. Stone is retarted.
　
---
　
"There was no investment of any meaningful type in the physical economy, there was no protection of the American people," Sean explains. "Rather, an illegal commitment made on behalf of private banking interests, to commit the American people to paying a debt that the American people did not accrue."
He rightly notes that Obama’s actions "represent the most clear violation of the principal of the general welfare of the people in the preamble of the Constitution of the United States."
　
--
　
So, we're blaming President Obama for what President Bush, in 2008, did? Grand! Once again I ask, where is the movie for Impeaching President Bush at?
　
---
　
In addition to setting the stage for the economic rape of the American people and waging illegal and unconstitutional wars, Obama has committed a number of other egregious violations of the Constitution.
Specifically, Obama violated the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chystler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar while politically connected labor unions and preferential others received better deals.
　
--
　
Um...isn't that suppose to say, "Bush has committed a number of other egregious violations(...)" because Bush did. For example, Bush ok'ed the use of torture. And yet you rednecks are yelling about helping out the Libyan people.

"In addition to setting the stage for the economic rape of the American people(...)"

Oh, you mean the Bush Tax Cuts that the Republicans really like because it helps out the rich people by taking from the poor that was installed by the Bush Administration. Hoe nice of you to blame that on President Obama too...


"(...)when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chystler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar (...)"

GM...don't forget about GM. You're talking about the Auto Bailout that helped out a bunch of people that could have been fired from their job. Yeah...that was such a bad thing.../rolleyes/.
　
---
　
In addition, the Dodd-Fran "reform" bill created the so-called Financial Protection Bureau and Financial Stability Oversight Council, bureaucratic monstrosities that are now engaged in unchecked and unconstitutional economic action without consulting Congress. The Dodd-Frank bill also further empowers the bankster's preferred teatment, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred years).
　
--
　
Well, I'm just glad that Alex hasn't went all the way to declare that the Dodd-Frank reform bill was the reason why the the economy collasped...yet.
　
"(...) the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred years)."
　
Here's the funny thing. Alex cries about how President Obama didn't go though Congress took the No Fly Zone for Libya, but doesn't notice that the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (that put up the Federal Reserve) was passed by Congress and the Senate in 1913, and states that it's "unconstitutional" because he doesn't like it. Just keep on throwing out you're hypocrisy, Alex...we all love it.
　
---
　
The Obamacare mandate is the most obvious violation. "No list of President Obama’s constitutional violations would be complete without including the requirement that every American purchase health insurance, on penalty of civil fine.

The individual mandate is unprecedented and exceeds Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce. If it is allowed to stand, Congress will be able to impose any kind of economic mandate as part of any kind of national regulatory scheme. Fortunately, the Supreme Court has a chance to strike this down during its current term," writes Ilya Shapiro, a Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute.
　
--
　
Do you know that there are states that have mandates for car insurance. Yes, you have to have car insurance in most states in the US. Click on the words "mandates for car insurance" and scroll down the page that comes up for an extra laugh at Alex Jones, because he's too much of an idiot to look at where he lives. Once again, it's a need to have car insurance but not health insurance. Oh, and if you don't have car insurance, you'll get fined by the police, like you would with this health care mandate.
　
---
　
Obama signed into law the NDAA with a provision allowing the military to indefinitely detain American citizens. "He will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law," said the executive director of the ACLU, Anthony Romeo.
　
--
　
Yeah, because George Bush isn't real. It's was only your imagination...I don't like the idea of the NDAA because it's just more money to the military that we could be spending on things that this country needs.
　
---
　
Finally, Obama may be tried and impeached for signing a large number of executive orders. Article II of the Constitution provides the president with three options when presented with legislation – do nothing, sign the bill, or veto it in its entirety.
　
--
　
Once again, George Bush isn't real.
　
---
　
"Obama’s use of signing statements has clearly shown his willingness tocontinue the George Bush legacy– not only of torture and illegal detainment, but in the dangerous trend of de facto rule by ‘executive fiat.’ Worse, such signing statements put in place a precedent for future presidents to follow – or expand upon," writes Aaron Dykes
　
--
　
"Obama’s use of signing statements (...)"
　
Like George Bush did...
　
"(...) not only of torture(...)"
　
Yeah...what? Not even near it. The torture was stopped on January 22, 2009 by President Obama.
　
"(...)and illegal detainment(...)"
　
Hey, you got something...finally...
　
---
　
Obama is definitely a renegade president in violation of the law. He is guilty of treason and must be brought up on formal charges. The House must introduce a resolution for impeachment and a trial must be held in the Senate.

It can be argued that Obama has done little different than any number of presidents going back to Abraham Lincoln. Now is the time to put an end to this treasonous and tyrannical behavior. If we continue to allow the executive to flagrantly violate the Constitution, we will eventually end up with a full-blown dictatorship run out of the White House. Congress will become ceremonial and the will of the American people will be null and void once and for all.
　
--
　
Yeah, because all of George Bushes "war crimes" was not war crimes at all and when George lied to Congress about Iraq and WMD's (WHICH IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE, BY THE WAY!), he didn't do anything wrong...somehow. Wait...what the hell...?
　
"(...) Obama has done little different than any number of presidents going back to Abraham Lincoln. Now is the time to put an end to this treasonous and tyrannical behavior."
　
Did Alex just call Abraham Lincoln (and all the other presidents from President Lincoln up to President Obama) a traitor? What the hell dude?
　
Thank you for reading and looking. Hope you enjoyed my first post back.
　
Shydude89.