Showing posts with label George Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Bush. Show all posts

Friday, July 13, 2012

Ron Paul: Kosovo Genocide and Syria Massacre Are Propaganda For War.

I thought it would be a good idea to do two posts in one day. So, here's the second post in one day.

So, Ron Paul went crazy yet again while I wasn't reporting on him for a month or two. This time Ron Paul states that the massacre in Syria is propaganda and perpertrated by the rebels that are fighting against the Army of Syria and Al-Assad. And, in the first article we're going to go through, that Ron Paul acutally says that the Kosvo Genocide was propaganda and that it didn't happen. I wonder what he thinks about the holocaust. Yes, as you might have noticed, I'm doing two articles on Ron Paul, mostly on the same thing which is Syria. The next one will be up tomorrow. So, let's get started with the first one known as "War Drums For Syria?"

----------
 
War drums are beating again in Washington. This time Syria is in the crosshairs after a massacre there last week left more than 100 dead. As might be expected from an administration with an announced policy of "regime change" in Syria, the reaction was to blame only the Syrian government for the tragedy, expel Syrian diplomats from Washington, and announce that the US may attack Syria even without UN approval. Of course, the idea that the administration should follow the Constitution and seek a Declaration of War from Congress is considered even more anachronistic now than under the previous administration. 
---------------
 
 
Yeah...what? We don't look for UN approval? What a bunch of bullshit. Look at this article from the Washington Post:
 
---


"(...) the reaction was to blame only the Syrian government for the tragedy, expel Syrian diplomats from Washington, and announce that the US may attack Syria even without UN approval." 
The U.N. Security Council opened negotiations Thursday over dueling Russian and U.S.-backed resolutions aimed at breaking the diplomatic gridlock over Syria as violence continued to rack the country.
 

----
 
"(...)
Thursday over dueling Russian and U.S.-backed resolutions (...)"
Look, we didn't look for UN Approv...oh, wait!

And if you think this was a once and a lifetime thing we did, guess again. From the UN Website S(ecuirty)C(ouncil)/10403 on Oct. 4th 2011.
 
---


The Security Council this afternoon failed to adopt a resolution that would have condemned "grave and systematic human rights violations" in Syria, and would have warned of options for action to be considered against the Government of President Bashar al-Assad if the unfolding situation warranted, including measures under the section of the United Nations Charter that allowed sanctions.

The text, which was defeated due to the negative votes of two permanent Council members (China, Russian Federation), drew 9 votes in favour with 4 abstentions (Brazil, India, Lebanon, South Africa). It would have demanded an immediate end to violence and urged all sides to reject extremism, expressing "profound regret at the deaths of thousands of people including women and children"


(...)

The representative of the United States expressed outrage over the Council’s failure to take minimum steps to protect civilians in Syria after long, hard negotiations. She warned that, after today’s veto, the people of Syria could see who supported their aspirations for freedom and democracy and who chose to prop up "desperate, cruel dictators".
 
----
 
Yeah, guess we didn't do anything, eh, Ron Paul? More from Ron Paul:
 
-----------


It may be the case that the Syrian military was responsible for the events last week, but recent bombings and attacks have been carried out by armed rebels with reported al-Qaeda ties. With the stakes so high, it would make sense to wait for a full investigation – unless the truth is less important than stirring up emotions in favor of a US attack. 

------------------
 
"With the stakes so high, it would make sense to wait for a full investigation (...)"

 
This part of the sentence makes me so pissed off. It's like saying if your friend was doing hard drugs, and you knew he/she was, would you step in right after the 'full investagtion' of your friends body finds that your friend died of (hard drug here) OD? Because, according to Ron Paul, that's what you should do.


-----------

There is ample reason to be skeptical about US government claims amplified in mainstream media reports. How many times recently have lies and exaggerations been used to push for the use of force overseas? It was not long ago that we were told Gaddafi was planning genocide for the people of Libya, and the only way to stop it was a US attack. Those claims turned out to be false, but by then the US and NATO had already bombed Libya, destroying its infrastructure, killing untold numbers of civilians, and leaving a gang of violent thugs in charge. 

-----------------
 

"There is ample reason to be skeptical about US government claims amplified in mainstream media reports. How many times recently have lies and exaggerations been used to push for the use of force overseas?" Ok, fine. How about the United Kingdoms media. Wait, that's from the BBC (It's a corperation after all). How about The Guardian, the newspaper that uncovered Rupert Murdoch's scandle. There you go, read that.
 
"It was not long ago that we were told Gaddafi was planning genocide for the people of Libya, and the only way to stop it was a US attack. Those claims turned out to be false (...)"
 
Execuse me!
 
---


In a statement, the council demanded an immediate end to the violence and said Libya's rulers had to "address the legitimate demands of the population".

At least 300 people have been killed so far in the uprising.

Earlier, Col Muammar Gaddafi urged his supporters to attack the "cockroaches" and "rats" protesting against his rule.

Anyone who took up arms against Libya would be executed, he warned.



(...)

Standing outside the Bab al-Aziza barracks in Tripoli, damaged by a US air strike in 1986, he vowed: "I am not going to leave this land. I will die here as a martyr. I shall remain here defiant."

He also called on his supporters to "cleanse Libya house by house" until the protesters surrendered.

"All of you who love Muammar Gaddafi, go out on the streets, secure the streets, don't be afraid of them. Chase them, arrest them, hand them over," he said.

He portrayed the protesters as misguided youths who had been given drugs and money by a "small, sick group", and blamed "bearded men" - a reference to Islamists - and Libyans living abroad for fomenting the violence.

"The hour of work is here, the hour of onslaught is here, the hour of victory is here. No retreat, forward, forward, forward. Revolution, revolution," he shouted at the end of the speech, pumping both fists in the air.



(...)

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Col Gaddafi's speech was "very, very appalling" and "amounted to him declaring war on his own people".

In New York, Mr Dabbashi said he had received information that the Libyan leader's supporters had started attacking people in all western cities.

"The Gaddafi statement was just code for his collaborators to start the genocide against the Libyan people. It just started a few hours ago. I hope the information I get is not accurate but if it is, it will be a real genocide," he told reporters.
 

-----
 
Gaddaffi did this to himself, we didn't do it for him. Gaddaffi made that speech, not the US Gov. Back to Ron Paul.
 
----------------
 
Likewise, we were told numerous falsehoods to increase popular support for the 2003 war on Iraq, including salacious stories of trans-Atlantic drones and WMDs. Advocates of war did not understand the complexities of Iraqi society, including its tribal and religious differences. As a result, Iraq today is a chaotic mess, with its ancient Christian population eliminated and the economy set back decades. An unnecessary war brought about by lies and manipulation never ends well.
 
---------------------
 
"(...) for the 2003 war on Iraq, including salacious stories of trans-Atlantic drones and WMDs."
 
Um...Iraq had drones!?


----------------

Earlier still, we were told lies about genocide and massacres in Kosovo to pave the way for President Clinton's bombing campaign against Yugoslavia. More than 12 years later, that region is every bit as unstable and dangerous as before the US intervention – and American troops are still there. 

-----------------------
 
"Earlier still, we were told lies about genocide and massacres in Kosovo (...)"
 
You better be joking motherfucker. Just in case if you're not...

Here is the US State Department account of the Ethnic Cleansing in Kosovo.

And here's the report of the Atrocities (on April 2, 1999) of the Ethinic Cleansing of Albainans in Kosovo by the Serbs.

And here's your photograpic evidence ( Please Note: Clicking on the "photograpic evidence" link will take you to a site with links to the photos).
 
What does genocide mean? The definition of genocide is:
the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group
Looks like Serbs killing Albaians in Kosovo is a genocide. So, no, it was not a lie.
 
" (...) that region is every bit as unstable and dangerous as before the US intervention – and American troops are still there."
 

Not really. The killings stopped so, that's good. Back to Ron Paul.
 

------------------ 

The story about the Syrian massacre keeps changing, which should raise suspicions. First, we were told that the killings were caused by government shelling, but then it was discovered that most were killed at close range with handgun fire and knives. No one has explained why government forces would take the time to go house to house binding the hands of the victims before shooting them, and then retreat to allow the rebels in to record the gruesome details. No one wants to ask or answer the disturbing questions, but it would be wise to ask ourselves who benefits from these stories. 

---------------------------
 
"First, we were told that the killings were caused by government shelling, but then it was discovered that most were killed at close range with handgun fire and knives."  



Looks like Ron Paul can't put it together, doesn't it? Ok, so there is shelling first, and then the group of Al-Assads' military come in there and killed people who didn't die in the shelling. You get it now?
 
"No one has explained why government forces would take the time to go house to house binding the hands of the victims before shooting them, and then retreat to allow the rebels in to record the gruesome details."
 
Yeah, because that couldn't be taken as, like, a warning to the others if they keep protesting and going after the military people of Al-Assads regime that that will happen to them, could it?
 
"No one wants to ask or answer the disturbing questions, but it would be wise to ask ourselves who benefits from these stories."
 
I think the people that benifits from these real life horror stories that is happening in Syria are the people that are against Al-Assad's violent regime, because if it was up to you, Ron Paul, we would just listen to Al-Assad, not giving one thought to those people on the ground that are dieing for their on freedom from Al-Assad.
 
-----------------
 
We have seen media reports over the past several weeks that the Obama administration is providing direct "non-lethal" assistance to the rebels in Syria while facilitating the transfer of weapons from other Gulf States. This semi-covert assistance to rebels we don't know much about threatens to become overt intervention. Last week Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said about Syria, "I think the military option should be considered." And here all along I thought it was up to Congress to decide when we go to war, not the generals.

We are on a fast track to war against Syria. It is time to put on the brakes.


-------------------------
 
"Last week Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said about Syria, "I think the military option should be considered." And here all along I thought it was up to Congress to decide when we go to war, not the generals."  



Um...this wouldn't be considered a war in the first place. It would be known as an intervention, which we don't need Congress's approval, but the UN's approval to go and help out the people of Syria, kind of like what we did with Libya. And you want to know something...we didn't lose one guy in the intervention in Libya.

 " (...) fast track to war against Syria."
 
No. It's an Intervetion.
 
Thank you for looking.
 
Shydude89.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Alex Tells Us A Scary Story About Obama Being A 'United Nations President'

Ok well, here's something new. Alex Jones states that Barack Obama is not an American President, he's the 'United Nations President'. Let's just get to the story...I hope you all have more then one pair of underware for this story... : P
 
Paragraph 1 - President Barack Obama has continued the secret policy of destroying the sovereignty and wealth of the United States to the benefit of the private transnational interests who control the United Nations, the CIA, Wall Street, and the global banking system. Numerous American presidents, both Republican and Democrat, are on board with this treasonous political agenda.
 
"(...) destroying the sovereignty and wealth of the United States to the benefit of the private transnational interests (...)"
 
Yeah, because Barack Obama was the president since 2001 and made the Obama tax cuts for the rich in that year and in again in 2003. Facepalm! Just in case if you believe this, it was the Bush Tax Cuts that really fucked this country over, not to mention the illegal war that Bush put us into in Iraq and the lieing he had to tell to Congress.
 
Paragraph 2 - Obama is not an "American" president; he is a United Nations president.
 
(Buzzer sound) Sorry, you're wrong. The UN President, right now, is General-Secertary Ban-Ki Moon. If you were looking for the UN General Assembly of the UN, you'd be wrong too, because the President of the General Assembly, in the 66th year in 2011, is Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser of the country of Qatar. I would like to point out that during the 66 years of the UN General Assembly, no one from the United States has ever been in charge of the General Assembly. The American President, right now, is President Barack Obama...weather you like it or not, you fuck. Moving on...
 
Paragraph 3 - The criminal international banksters and secret societies behind the creation of the United Nations, and the Barack Obama icon, use fraud, usury, debt, terror, deception, propaganda, false flags, and war to get what they want out of countries. They treat all countries like third world colonies, including America. The people are plundered and destroyed, while the criminal eleties are protected.
 
" The criminal international banksters and secret societies behind the creation of the United Nations (...)"

I thought that the UN was established so that World War 3 wouldn't break out like WW1 and WW2 did. You know, so that nations can talk about things instead of just going ot war with each other or something like that.
 
" (...) and the Barack Obama icon, use fraud, usury, debt, terror, deception, propaganda, false flags, and war to get what they want out of countries."
 
Yeah, you remember when Barack Obama told Congress that there was WMD's in Iraq in 2003 to go and get oil and signed legislation for tax cuts for the rich? You don't..well, I don't neither.
 
Paragraph 4 - The election of Obama represents a massive constitutional crisis in America because he was born in Kenya, and is thus illegally holding the office of the presidency. He is the presidential equivalent of an illegal alien. It is hard to believe this is true because it is pretty wild. But no intellectually honest person can ignore the evidence and defend Obama’s claim that he was born in America. It is illogical to deny the facts and stick to illusions
 
"The election of Obama represents a massive constitutional crisis in America because he was born in Kenya (...)"
 
And here is where I call bullshit. The Secret Service, the FBI, the DOJ, and the CIA have all looked into this and oddly enough, if Obama was really born in Kenya, then why did they let Obama become a Presidental Candidate. Then again, you could say the same for McCain, becasue McCain was born in Panama...only thing is, McCain is white. So, why didn't the Right Wing, going after people who had something wrong with their birth cirtificate, go after McCain? Becasue Obama is black and scary of course. (Please note: I don't find the President scary, but the Right Wing, who love their skin color and think it's important, probably do.)
 
Paragraph 5 - The significance of Obama’s true birthplace is monumental. The entire American experiment is being put into question. The U.S. Constitution has been thrown out. America is fully controlled by genocidal war criminals who teach young and impressionable soldiers that wiping out Islam and using nukes on Middle Eastern cities is a military solution to end the mythic "clash of civilizations" between the West and Islam.
 
I'm sorry, when did Obama starting signing "Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" song by John McCain? And the only 'genocidal war crimanals' are the Republicans, as shown in the video of John McCain signing 'bomb Iran'.
 
Pararaph 6 - Obama, far from being a secret Muslim, is actually a secret CIA agent who likes the idea of attacking Iran as much as any Neocon, Israeli, and fascist. Obama is not a peacemaker or a saint. Like the mad king of Israel, Obama is a mad psychopath who lies for a living. He worships the god of war because only war can unleash the forces of violent change and political transformation.
 
"(...) is actually a secret CIA agent (...)"
 
Are we sure that Alex isn't pulling a Hal Tuner...
 
"Obama (...) likes the idea of attacking Iran as much as any Neocon, Israeli, and fascist."
 
No, I think you got confused between Obama and McCain. McCain was the one that was signing 'Bomb Iran'.
 
"He (Obama) worships the god of war because only war can unleash the forces of violent change and political transformation."
 
Because George Bush was the peacemaker in this story.
 
Paragraph 7 - Obama and his masters are secretly working to cause the destruction of America, along with Israel, Iran, and other nations in the Middle East. Obama does not desire peace with Iran, but an epic and total war that will culminate in the establishment of a world authoritarian state with U.S. military power to back it up.
 
"Obama does not desire peace with Iran, but an epic and total war (...)"
 
No, not even close. The one that wants a 'epic and total war' with the Ismaic Republic of Iran, as of right now between Mitt Romeny and President Obama, would be Mitt Romeny stating that we, the American people need to prepare for a war with Iran.
 
Paragraph 8 - In September 2009, Obama became, "the first-ever U.S. president to chair the United Nations’ 15-member Security Council,". That was only the beginning. Obama is probably being primed to be the first United Nations president, since he is obviously not a legitimate and legal American president.
 
Ugh...why is Alex so damn stupid. This doesn't mean anything. You know why? You know those African and European and Asian and other continents with countries in them? Do you really think their presidents ever go to the UN building in NYC (execpt, like, once in a blue moon if they need to go)? The answer would be no. They usually have their own delegates that are here in our country so if the UN calls for a meeting, that delegate would go to the UN building insead of having the President of every country coming to the US. Then that delegate would report back to the President of their countries to tell them what happened. So, instead of having an American delegate go to the UN Building, Obama thought it would be a good idea to sit in on Security Council meeting. Oh My God, was this so hard to understand...
 
"Obama is probably being primed to be the first United Nations president (...)"
 
And Alex is probably a big fucking retard...probably.
 
Paragraph 9 - The fraudulent elections of Bush and Obama signaled the destruction of America. Bush’s elections were fraudulent because they were stolen, and Obama’s election was fraudulent because he was born in Kenya, not America.
 
"(...) Obama’s election was fraudulent because he was born in Kenya, not America."
 
Replace the word Kenya (take out the word 'in') with black and replace the word America with white...vola! You have the reason why the Right Wing hates Obama.
 
Paragraph 10 - Both the American presidency and the Congress have been destroyed. These institutions are dead. The plan of the globalist fascists is to completely destroy America as an independent political unit with its own national constitution and destiny.
 
WTF?
 
Paragraph 11 - The 1913 Federal Reserve Act destroyed America’s financial independence, so the subversion and destruction of America from within has been a century-long effort by the Anglo-American oligarchy. Secrecy, totalitarian deception, and terrorism are their three main weapons. The treasonous American media has been their biggest ally in their silent war on the American Constitution and the American people.
 
The Federal Reseve Act of 1913 created a Federal montary system. I don't really understand why this is a bad thing.
 
"The treasonous American media has been their biggest ally in their silent war on the American Constitution and the American people."
 
Yeah, the treasonous media like those found on Alex Jones site. (I can point out 5 or 6 articles that are taken from the AP, Reuters, and Fox News on Alexs' site, so why is it ok for Alex to take from the media and twist it but it's not ok for his viewers to make their own decisions on them. When I say this, I mean when Alex is ont he radio going over and twisting everything when he talks about it).
 
Paragraph 12 - Infowars.com points out that Obama was a British subject at the time of his birth. I guess this is the British Empire’s way of getting back at the rebellious American people for defeating the British army in the 18th century and creating a free and independent government.
 
Well, he'd be right, IF Obama was born in Kenya. Kenyas' independence was on December 12th, 1963 and Obama's birth was on Augest 4th, 1961. Of course, Obama was born in Hawaii so there is no reason to bring this up unless if you're ignorant of reality, like Alex Jones and his infowarriors are.
 
Paragraph 13 - But Obama is more than a joke. Obama is like a political virus who is attacking the U.S. national nervous system and destabilizing the natural defenses of the body politic. Obama kills silently, in the night, when everybody is asleep and dreaming.
 
"But Obama is more than a joke."
 
Yeah, you rememeber when Obama tried to go out the wrong door and he pulled the door and then looked at the camera and shurgged. And how about that time when Obama got drunk and touched German Chancellor Angla Merkal trying to give her a massege while in the UN Building...oh, wait, that was then-President Bush...oops.
 
So, what did Obama do? Oh, that's right, he got us out of Iraq and got Osama Bin Laden (with the Special Forces). What a joke that Nobama is hahahaha FUCK YOU ALEX!
 
"Obama kills silently, in the night, when everybody is asleep and dreaming."
 
Yeah he almost got Osama Bin Laden (with the Speical Forces) while everyone was sleeping. Too bad that he gave the go ahead before everyone could fall asleep.
 
Paragraph 14 - Since he came into office, Obama has done nothing to better the lives of the American people and improve the American nation. Even if he wanted to help the American people and make America better, he would be stopped by his masters because, as Alex Jones says in this video, he is compromised.
 
" (...) Obama has done nothing to better the lives of the American people and improve the American nation."
 
Yeah! Well, execpt for the $800 tax credit you got in 2010, and he killed Osama Bin Laden, and got us out of Iraq and tried to get the health insurance to comply with rules in the ObamaCare package that would make health care more affordable for people who don't have it...WHAT A FUCKING ASSHOLE. / He's so fucking uppity / (sarcasm), just cold trying to do something to help out this country. Why didn't he just bomb bomb bomb Iran like McCain, the old guy from Panama, wanted to do. God...
 
Paragraph 15 - Obama is blackmailable from head to toe. The enemies of America, both foreign (Israel) and domestic (Wall Street banksters, criminal multinational corporations, political opponents), love the fact that Obama is in the White House.
 
Uh...Israel is an enemy of America now? When?
 
"Obama is blackmailable from head to toe."
 
No. Well, not to the point of the upmost gullibilty of your fan base, Alex.
 
Paragraph 16 - The mythic fairytale about the Osama Bin Laden killing was intended to make the public believe that Obama is in charge and he is a great war leader. But Obama takes orders, he doesn’t give them. There would be no difference if a slave or a robot was in the White House instead of Obama. Obama is worse than a robot and a slave. He is a psychopathic liar and killer who loves death and destruction.
 
What the...
 
"There would be no difference if a slave or a robot was in the White House instead of Obama."
 
Bullshit. But I would like to point out that if this was said about Bush it would need to read "There would be no difference if Rumsfeild or Cheny was in the White House instead of Bush."
 
"He is a psychopathic liar and killer who loves death and destruction."
 
Bush was such a great truth teller (lie about Iraqi WMD's in Congress) and Bush loves babies (puts kids off to war in Iraq). See?
 
Well, now I feel better getting all of this out. I'm back baby...with a vengence!
 
Shydude89.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Alex Jones Will Win America By Making Idiotic Movie About President Obama.

You might be wondering what Alex Jones was up to this whole time I was away (or not). If you didn't, I'm goign to tell you anyway. He's too busy making a stupid movie known as Obama Impeachment 2012. It's jammed packed with bullshit and so is the article we will be going over today (the same as the "Obama Impeachmet 2012" link). You might be wondering why he's making this movie. Alex explains beacuse President Obama committed some type of "war crimes"...beacuse George Bush never did. /rolleyes/ (Please Note: Three minus symbols (---) means the start of a paragraph(s) and two (--) of them means the end of the paragraph(s) in the article.)

---

"We can only win by launching Impeach Obama 2012. Whether or not we fully impeach him, we are committed to rebuking these unconstitutional and criminal power grabs and are determined to take the case to the court of public opinion.
–Alex Jones"

--

When I saw that second part I thought they were talking about George Bush...why wasn't there a movie to impeach Bush at the end of 2004? He committed war crimes ( launching illegal offensive on Iraq and oking torture), so where is the Bush movie?
 
---
 
Film director, producer, actor and writer Sean Stone has thrown his weight behind a resolution introduced in the House last month by North Carolina Republican Walter Jones. Resolution 107 states that should the president use offensive military force without the authorization of Congress that such an act would be "an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor."

Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves exclusively for Congress the power to declare war. Both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison argued that the power to declare war must reside in the legislative branch of government and the president will only act as the commander-in-chief and direct the war after it is declared by Congress.
 
--

Ok, two question. Why do we need a resolution if it's already in the Constitution (the Republicans really are stupid aren't they)? And what "war" did the President Obama start?
 
---
 
"The constitution supposes, what the history of all governments demonstrates, that the executive is the branch of power most interested in war, and most prone to it. It has accordingly with studied care vested the question of war in the legislature," Madison wrote.

In the video, Stone notes Obama’s unconstitutional war on Libya was waged "despite the fact that the United States was neither attacked, nor threatened for attack by the nation of Libya."
 
--
 
Wait...President Obama waged a "war" on Libya? Uh, no. The UN Security Council had voted, which we are a part of,  to help out the Libyan people, rebeling against Colonel Gaddiffi, with a No Fly Zone. Other countries had help out (France, and England) taking the lead into Libya to set up a No Fly Zone for Colonel Gaddiffi's Airforce. We didn't even lead into Libya. And a side note; We didn't need Congress to say yes to a "war" because it wasn't a "war". It's was a humanitarian crisis. The Libyan people needed International help from Colonel Gaddiffi killing them and we gave it to them by putting up a No Fly Zone.
Oh, forgot one thing...

"(...)unconstitutional war on Libya was waged "despite the fact that the United States was neither attacked, nor threatened for attack by the nation of Libya."

One word: Iraq. Now where is the film about getting George Bush impeached?
 
---
 
Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said during questioning by Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama that the Obama administration does not believe Congress has the exclusive right to declare war and that the Pentagon answers to the United Nations, not the people of the United States.

The Obama administration "does not believe that the Congress has the exclusive power to declare war," Stone notes, and "accordingly the president should be impeached."
 
--
 
One thing should be said of this paragraph about Leon Panetta. He said that, "You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress." about the intervention in Libya. While I think it would be a good thing to go throug the Congress, it could mean trouble for the Libyan people who are needing our help (you know that the Congress would never pass the resolution bill and let people die at the hands of Colonel / Dictator Gaddiffi).
 
---
 
Stone also mentions Obama’s facilitation of the banker engineered 2008 "bailout" as an additiojnal reason he should be tried for High Crimes and Misdemeanors and impeached. Obama’s efforts worked in favor of the "consolidation of private banks, many of them in Europe."
 
--
 
Well, this sentence tell me that this Mr. Stone is really retarted. Why, you may be asking? Let's see if I can point it out for you:
 
" (...) Obama’s facilitation of the banker engineered 2008 "bailout" (...).
 
2008? Didn't President Obama get in office on January 20, 2009? So, how is the banker bailout of 2008 Obama's fault? Like I said, Mr. Stone is retarted.
 
---
 
"There was no investment of any meaningful type in the physical economy, there was no protection of the American people," Sean explains. "Rather, an illegal commitment made on behalf of private banking interests, to commit the American people to paying a debt that the American people did not accrue."
He rightly notes that Obama’s actions "represent the most clear violation of the principal of the general welfare of the people in the preamble of the Constitution of the United States."
 
--
 
So, we're blaming President Obama for what President Bush, in 2008, did? Grand! Once again I ask, where is the movie for Impeaching President Bush at?
 
---
 
In addition to setting the stage for the economic rape of the American people and waging illegal and unconstitutional wars, Obama has committed a number of other egregious violations of the Constitution.
Specifically, Obama violated the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chystler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar while politically connected labor unions and preferential others received better deals.
 
--
 
Um...isn't that suppose to say, "Bush has committed a number of other egregious violations(...)" because Bush did. For example, Bush ok'ed the use of torture. And yet you rednecks are yelling about helping out the Libyan people.

"In addition to setting the stage for the economic rape of the American people(...)"

Oh, you mean the Bush Tax Cuts that the Republicans really like because it helps out the rich people by taking from the poor that was installed by the Bush Administration. Hoe nice of you to blame that on President Obama too...


"(...)when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chystler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar (...)"

GM...don't forget about GM. You're talking about the Auto Bailout that helped out a bunch of people that could have been fired from their job. Yeah...that was such a bad thing.../rolleyes/.
 
---
 
In addition, the Dodd-Fran "reform" bill created the so-called Financial Protection Bureau and Financial Stability Oversight Council, bureaucratic monstrosities that are now engaged in unchecked and unconstitutional economic action without consulting Congress. The Dodd-Frank bill also further empowers the bankster's preferred teatment, the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred years).
 
--
 
Well, I'm just glad that Alex hasn't went all the way to declare that the Dodd-Frank reform bill was the reason why the the economy collasped...yet.
 
"(...) the Federal Reserve (which has engaged in unconstitutional activity for nearly a hundred years)."
 
Here's the funny thing. Alex cries about how President Obama didn't go though Congress took the No Fly Zone for Libya, but doesn't notice that the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (that put up the Federal Reserve) was passed by Congress and the Senate in 1913, and states that it's "unconstitutional" because he doesn't like it. Just keep on throwing out you're hypocrisy, Alex...we all love it.
 
---
 
The Obamacare mandate is the most obvious violation. "No list of President Obama’s constitutional violations would be complete without including the requirement that every American purchase health insurance, on penalty of civil fine.

The individual mandate is unprecedented and exceeds Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce. If it is allowed to stand, Congress will be able to impose any kind of economic mandate as part of any kind of national regulatory scheme. Fortunately, the Supreme Court has a chance to strike this down during its current term," writes Ilya Shapiro, a Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute.
 
--
 
Do you know that there are states that have mandates for car insurance. Yes, you have to have car insurance in most states in the US. Click on the words "mandates for car insurance" and scroll down the page that comes up for an extra laugh at Alex Jones, because he's too much of an idiot to look at where he lives. Once again, it's a need to have car insurance but not health insurance. Oh, and if you don't have car insurance, you'll get fined by the police, like you would with this health care mandate.
 
---
 
Obama signed into law the NDAA with a provision allowing the military to indefinitely detain American citizens. "He will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law," said the executive director of the ACLU, Anthony Romeo.
 
--
 
Yeah, because George Bush isn't real. It's was only your imagination...I don't like the idea of the NDAA because it's just more money to the military that we could be spending on things that this country needs.
 
---
 
Finally, Obama may be tried and impeached for signing a large number of executive orders. Article II of the Constitution provides the president with three options when presented with legislation – do nothing, sign the bill, or veto it in its entirety.
 
--
 
Once again, George Bush isn't real.
 
---
 
"Obama’s use of signing statements has clearly shown his willingness tocontinue the George Bush legacy– not only of torture and illegal detainment, but in the dangerous trend of de facto rule by ‘executive fiat.’ Worse, such signing statements put in place a precedent for future presidents to follow – or expand upon," writes Aaron Dykes
 
--
 
"Obama’s use of signing statements (...)"
 
Like George Bush did...
 
"(...) not only of torture(...)"
 
Yeah...what? Not even near it. The torture was stopped on January 22, 2009 by President Obama.
 
"(...)and illegal detainment(...)"
 
Hey, you got something...finally...
 
---
 
Obama is definitely a renegade president in violation of the law. He is guilty of treason and must be brought up on formal charges. The House must introduce a resolution for impeachment and a trial must be held in the Senate.

It can be argued that Obama has done little different than any number of presidents going back to Abraham Lincoln. Now is the time to put an end to this treasonous and tyrannical behavior. If we continue to allow the executive to flagrantly violate the Constitution, we will eventually end up with a full-blown dictatorship run out of the White House. Congress will become ceremonial and the will of the American people will be null and void once and for all.
 
--
 
Yeah, because all of George Bushes "war crimes" was not war crimes at all and when George lied to Congress about Iraq and WMD's (WHICH IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE, BY THE WAY!), he didn't do anything wrong...somehow. Wait...what the hell...?
 
"(...) Obama has done little different than any number of presidents going back to Abraham Lincoln. Now is the time to put an end to this treasonous and tyrannical behavior."
 
Did Alex just call Abraham Lincoln (and all the other presidents from President Lincoln up to President Obama) a traitor? What the hell dude?
 
Thank you for reading and looking. Hope you enjoyed my first post back.
 
Shydude89.